Popular Products
Compare Oppo Reno 3 Pro Vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Should you buy Oppo Reno 3 Pro or Samsung Galaxy Folder 2? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Oppo Reno 3 Pro starts at BDT 43,428 and Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 starts at BDT 36,075.
Oppo Reno 3 Pro has screen size of 6.4 inches and Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 has screen size of 3.8 inches, (74.6% screen-to-body ratio). Oppo Reno 3 Pro comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 8 GB . Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 comes up with internal storage of 16 GB and RAM of 2 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8) + 8 MP (f/2.2) + 13 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4) Quad Camera with LED Flash and front camera of 44 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4) Dual Camera whereas latter has primary camera of 8MP and front camera of 5 MP (f/1.9).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Oppo Reno 3 Pro Vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
| Specifications | Oppo Reno 3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 10 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Screen Size | 6.4 inches | 3.8 inches, (74.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P95 | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 86 | 60 | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) | |
| Screen Size | 6.4 inches | 3.8 inches, (74.6% screen-to-body ratio) | |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P95 | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) | |
| RAM | 2 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | White, Black, Gold, Red | |
| Custom UI | ColorOS 7.0 | ||
| Device type | Phablet | Foldable Phone | |
| Operating System | Android 10 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) | |
| Sim | Dual SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Oppo Reno 3 Pro
- Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
DESIGN | |||
| Height | 158.8 mm | ||
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 165 grams | |
| Width | 73.4 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | ||
| Form Factor | Touch | ||
| Pixel Density | 405 ppi | 267 ppi density | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio | |
| Screen size | 6.4 inches | 3.8 inches, (74.6% screen-to-body ratio) | |
| Technology | sAMOLED (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | ||
| Touchscreen | Capacitive Touchscreen | ||
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Call Records | Unlimited | ||
| Card Slot | microSD Card | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P95 | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) | |
| CPU | Octa core (Dual 2.2GHz Cortex-A75 + Hexa 2GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
| External Storage | Up to 256 GB | ||
| GPU | IMG PowerVR GM 9446 | Adreno 308 | |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, Push Mail | ||
| Phonebook | Unlimited | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | HDR, Panorama, EIS | LED flash, HDR ,panorama | |
| Front Camera | 44 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4) Dual Camera | 5 MP (f/1.9) | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.8) + 8 MP (f/2.2) + 13 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4) Quad Camera with LED Flash | 8MP | |
| Video Recording | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | ||
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Audio Jack | ||
| Audio Player | MP3, WAV, eAAC+, FLAC | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes, Dolby Atmos, Dual speakers | ||
| Video Player | MP4, DivX, XviD, WMV, H.264, H.263 | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 4025 mAh battery | 1950 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX LE | |
| Browser | HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS,GLONASS | |
| USB | Type-C | microUSB 2.0 | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In-Display | ||
| Other Features | 30W VOOC 4.0 Quick Charging, NFC | ||
| Quick Charging | Yes, 30W vooc4.0 | Standard Charger 2.0 (2A) | |
| Sensors | In-Display Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, proximity | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Oppo Reno 3 Pro
- Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Oppo Reno 3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Design Comparison: Oppo Reno 3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Oppo Reno 3 Pro comes up with a weight of 175 g whereas Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 weights around 165 grams. Thickness of Oppo Reno 3 Pro is 8.1 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 16.1 mm.
Display Comparison: Oppo Reno 3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Oppo Reno 3 Pro has screen size of 6.4 inches whereas other comes up with 3.8 inches, (74.6% screen-to-body ratio). Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2400 pixels and 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses undefined and latter uses TFT capacitive touchscreen 16M colors.
Camera Comparison: Oppo Reno 3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Oppo Reno 3 Pro comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8) + 8 MP (f/2.2) + 13 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4) Quad Camera with LED Flash whereas Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 comes up with 8MP. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include HDR, Panorama, EIS .
Performance Comparison: Oppo Reno 3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 2
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are MediaTek Helio P95 and Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) respectively. Oppo Reno 3 Pro comes up microSD Card card slot and Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 comes up with microSD,up to 128 GB card slot. CPU used in Oppo Reno 3 Pro is Octa core (Dual 2.2GHz Cortex-A75 + Hexa 2GHz Cortex-A55) and used in Samsung Galaxy Folder 2 is Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53.