Compare HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652

Discuss

What is the difference between Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Should you buy phone having Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 or should go for HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 99112 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has AnTuTu score of 436390. Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 comes up with 8 cores, 1800 MHz frequency and on the other hand, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 has Adreno 510 GPU and Adreno 500 architecture and latter HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture.

Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.

Snapdragon 652 Vs Kirin 990 (4G)

SpecificationsSnapdragon 652Kirin 990 (4G)
Total score99112436390
Frequency1800 MHz2860 MHz
Max size4 GB12 GB
Max display resolution2560 x 16003360 x 1440
+ Read More

Compare Chipsets

Hide Common features
AnTuTu Score
CPU 40781138017
GPU 19716145170
Memory 2299698516
UX 1021655324
Total score 99112436390
Connectivity Features
Modem X8
4G support LTE Cat. 7LTE Cat. 21
5G support NoNo
Download speed Up to 300 MbpsUp to 1400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 MbpsUp to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 56
Bluetooth 4.15.0
Performance
Processor 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A724x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A532x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 88
Frequency 1800 MHz2860 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-AARMv8-A
L1 cache 256 KB
Process 28 nanometers7 nanometers
Transistor count 1 billion8 billion
Geekbench Score
Image compression 52.7 Mpixels/s148.7 Mpixels/s
Face detection 7.81 images/s23.9 images/s
Speech recognition 20.2 words/s54.1 words/s
Machine learning 12.7 images/s55.8 images/s
Camera shooting 5.67 images/s28.2 images/s
HTML 5 0.96 Mnodes/s3.13 Mnodes/s
SQLite 281.25 Krows/s797.5 Krows/s
Graphics
GPU name Adreno 510Mali G76 MP16
Architecture Adreno 500Bifrost
GPU frequency 600 MHz600 MHz
Execution units 116
Shading units 128256
FLOPS 153 Gigaflops768 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.01.0
OpenCL version 2.02.0
DirectX version 11.112
Memory Info
Memory type LPDDR3LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 933 MHz2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gbit/s31.78 Gbit/s
Max size 4 GB12 GB
Multimedia
Neural processor (NPU) NoDa Vinci
Storage type eMMC 5.1UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2560 x 16003360 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 21MP, 2x 13MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8H.264, H.265, VC-1
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Which Chipset would you prefer?

Infinity%
0%

Total:0

Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 has been announced on February 2015 whereas HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:

Benchmark Comparison: Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Snapdragon 652 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 99112 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 40781, 19716, 22996, 10216 respectively.

CPU Comparison: Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Snapdragon 652 comes up with the architecture of Adreno 500 and Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 1800 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.

Graphics Comparison: Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 has Adreno 510 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.

Memory Comparison: Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

First chipset has max size of 4 GB and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has max size of 4 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.

Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

In terms of multimedia, Snapdragon 652 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1 and Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.

Comments

FAQs

Q. Which model has better AnTuTu score - Snapdragon 652 or Kirin 990 (4G)?

Kirin 990 (4G) has higher AnTuTu score at 436390 compare to Snapdragon 652 with total AnTuTu score at 99112 only.

Q. Which model has higher base frequency among Snapdragon 652 and Kirin 990 (4G)?

Kirin 990 (4G) has a higher base frequency of 2860 MHz compared to Snapdragon 652 with 1800 MHz base frequency.

Q. Snapdragon 652 vs Kirin 990 (4G), which model has higher bandwidth?

Kirin 990 (4G) with 31.78 Gbit/s bandwidth is better than Snapdragon 652 with 14.9 Gbit/s bandwidth.

Q. Which model has higher number of cores - Snapdragon 652 or Kirin 990 (4G)?

Both Kirin 990 (4G) and Snapdragon 652 have same cores value of 8 cores.

Q. What are some of the best phones having - Snapdragon 652 in the market?

Best phones having Snapdragon 652 are Vivo V5, Micromax Dual 5, LYF F1S.