Popular Products
Compare Motorola Razr 50 Vs Vivo X200
Should you buy Motorola Razr 50 or Vivo X200? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Motorola Razr 50 starts at ₹ 64,999 and Vivo X200 starts at ₹ 65,999.
Motorola Razr 50 has screen size of 6.9 inches and Vivo X200 has screen size of 6.8 inches. Motorola Razr 50 comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Vivo X200 comes up with internal storage of 256GB and RAM of 12GB.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Motorola Razr 50 Vs Vivo X200
| Specifications | Motorola Razr 50 | Vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android v13 | |
| Screen Size | 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12GB / 16GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 74 | 99 | |
| OS | Android v13 | ||
| Screen Size | 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac | ||
| Custom UI | My UX | ||
| Device type | Smartphone | ||
| Operating System | Android v13 | ||
| Sim | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Motorola Razr 50
- Vivo X200
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Plastic front (opened), plastic front (closed), plastic back, aluminum frame (7000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | ||
| Weight | 188.6 g | 206 g (7.13 oz) | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 22:09 | 20:9 ratio | |
| Pixel Density | 413 ppi density | 453 ppi density | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio | |
| Screen size | 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Immortalis-G730 MC12 | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | |
| Front Camera | Punch Hole 32P 0.7µm f/2.45 (Wide Angle) | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), HDR, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus | ||
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, Cinematic mode (1080p) | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | No | 3.5mm Jack No | |
| FM Radio | No | ||
| Speakers | Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers | Loudspeaker Yes | |
BATTERY | |||
| Type | 4201 mAh | 5200mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | ||
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2, CDMA 800 | |
| 3G | Yes | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | LTE | |
| 5G | Yes | SA/NSA | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Fingerprint (under display, optical) | |
| Quick Charging | Yes, 44W Rapid Charging | 120W wired, 1-50% in 11 min (advertised), Reverse wired | |
| Sensors | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Motorola Razr 50
- Vivo X200
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X200
Performance Comparison: Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X200
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 and Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) respectively. Motorola Razr 50 comes up No card slot and Vivo X200 comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Motorola Razr 50 is 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor and used in Vivo X200 is Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720).