Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Vs Vivo V25 Pro 5G
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy Note 9 or Vivo V25 Pro 5G? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy Note 9 starts at ₹ 34,999 and Vivo V25 Pro 5G starts at ₹ 35,999.
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 has screen size of 6.4 inches and Vivo V25 Pro 5G has screen size of 6.56 inches. Samsung Galaxy Note 9 comes up with internal storage of 512 GB and RAM of 8 GB . Vivo V25 Pro 5G comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 12 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 12 MP (f/1.5) + 12 MP (f/2.4) Dual Camera with LED Flash and front camera of 8 MP (f/1.7) Camera with Auto Focus whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.9, wide) + 8 MP (F/2.2, ultrawide) + 2 MP (F/2.4, macro) + PDAF and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.5, wide).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Vs Vivo V25 Pro 5G
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | Vivo V25 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android OS, v8.1 (Oreo) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Screen Size | 6.4 inches | 6.56 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 / Exynos 9810 Octa | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 78 | 89 | |
| OS | Android OS, v8.1 (Oreo) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Screen Size | 6.4 inches | 6.56 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 / Exynos 9810 Octa | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | |
| RAM | 12 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Ocean Blue, Metallic Copper, Midnight Black | Pure Black, Sailing Blue | |
| Device type | Phablet | Smartphone | |
| Operating System | Android OS, v8.1 (Oreo) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy Note 9
- Vivo V25 Pro 5G
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Front/back glass, Aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back | |
| Height | 161.9 mm | ||
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 190 g (6.70 oz) | |
| Width | 76.4 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Form Factor | Touch | ||
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 2960 pixels | 1080 x 2376 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.4 inches | 6.56 inches | |
| Technology | Super AMOLED (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | ||
| Touchscreen | Capacitive Touchscreen | Yes, with Multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Card Slot | microSD Card | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 / Exynos 9810 Octa | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | |
| CPU | Octa Core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) / (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| External Storage | Up to 512 GB | ||
| GPU | Adreno 630 / Mali-G72 MP18 | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | Geo Tagging, HDR, Panorama, OIS | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | 8 MP (f/1.7) Camera with Auto Focus | 32 MP (f/2.5, wide) | |
| Primary camera | 12 MP (f/1.5) + 12 MP (f/2.4) Dual Camera with LED Flash | 64 MP (f/1.9, wide) + 8 MP (F/2.2, ultrawide) + 2 MP (F/2.4, macro) + PDAF | |
| Video Recording | 2160p@60fps, 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Audio Jack | ||
| Audio Player | WAV, AAC+, AC3, OGG, FLAC, WMA, MP3, AMR, AAC, MXMF, eAAC+ | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Stereo speakers | ||
| Video Player | 3GP, ASF, M4V, H.263, H.264, MKV, 3G2, DivX, AVI, WMV, FLV, MPEG4 | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 4000 mAh Battery | ||
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | Yes | |
| Browser | HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | |
| USB | v3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | Yes | |
| Other Features | Face Unlock, Quick Charging, NFC, Wireless Charging, Water resistant, Dust resistant | ||
| Quick Charging | Yes | Fast charging 66W, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint Sensor, Iris scanner, Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Hall Sensor | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Color changing back panel color | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy Note 9
- Vivo V25 Pro 5G
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs Vivo V25 Pro 5G
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs Vivo V25 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 comes up with primary camera of 12 MP (f/1.5) + 12 MP (f/2.4) Dual Camera with LED Flash whereas Vivo V25 Pro 5G comes up with 64 MP (f/1.9, wide) + 8 MP (F/2.2, ultrawide) + 2 MP (F/2.4, macro) + PDAF. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include Geo Tagging, HDR, Panorama, OIS .
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs Vivo V25 Pro 5G
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 / Exynos 9810 Octa and MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) respectively. Samsung Galaxy Note 9 comes up microSD Card card slot and Vivo V25 Pro 5G comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Samsung Galaxy Note 9 is Octa Core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) / (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) and used in Vivo V25 Pro 5G is Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55).