Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Vs Vivo X200 Pro
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 or Vivo X200 Pro? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 starts at ₹ 99,999 and Vivo X200 Pro starts at ₹ 94,999.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has screen size of 7.6 inches and Vivo X200 Pro has screen size of 6.8 inches. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes up with internal storage of 512 GB and RAM of 12 GB. Vivo X200 Pro comes up with internal storage of 256GB and RAM of 16 GB.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Vs Vivo X200 Pro
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android OS, v11 | |
| Screen Size | 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 85 | 69 | |
| OS | Android OS, v11 | ||
| Screen Size | 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Custom UI | One UI 2.0 | ||
| Device type | Foldable Phone | ||
| Operating System | Android OS, v11 | ||
| Sim | Dual Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
- Vivo X200 Pro
DISPLAY | |||
| Bezel Less Display | Yes, Punch-hole Display | ||
| Form Factor | Touch | ||
| Pixel Density | 372 ppi | 453 ppi density | |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144HZ | |
| Screen resolution | 1768 x 2208 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio | |
| Screen size | 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Technology | AMOLED | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch | Yes | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | Octa core (3.09 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 + 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Immortalis-G780 MC11 | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | Yes | ||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
| External Storage | No | ||
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Front Camera | 10 MP (Wide Angle Primary Camera) + 10 MP (Wide Angle Camera) | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), HDR, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
| Primary camera | 12 MP | ||
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes, USB Type-C | 3.5mm Jack No | |
| FM Radio | Yes | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers | Loudspeaker Yes | |
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 4275 mAh battery | 5420 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Browser | HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | ||
| GPS Facility | Yes with A-GPS, Glonass | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, charging connector pins | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2, CDMA 800 | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | LTE | |
| 5G | Yes | SA/NSA | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Fingerprint (under display, optical) | |
| Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
- Vivo X200 Pro
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Vivo X200 Pro
Display Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Vivo X200 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has screen size of 7.6 inches whereas other comes up with 6.8 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1768 x 2208 pixels and 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses AMOLED and latter uses undefined.
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Vivo X200 Pro
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus and Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) respectively. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes up No card slot and Vivo X200 Pro comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is Octa core (3.09 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 + 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585) and used in Vivo X200 Pro is Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720).