Popular Products
Compare Vivo V25 Pro 5G Vs Samsung Galaxy M34
Should you buy Vivo V25 Pro 5G or Samsung Galaxy M34? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Vivo V25 Pro 5G starts at ₹ 35,999 and Samsung Galaxy M34 starts at ₹ 31,768.
Vivo V25 Pro 5G has screen size of 6.56 inches and Samsung Galaxy M34 has screen size of 6.5 inches. Vivo V25 Pro 5G comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 12 GB. Samsung Galaxy M34 comes up with internal storage of 128GB and RAM of 8GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.9, wide) + 8 MP (F/2.2, ultrawide) + 2 MP (F/2.4, macro) + PDAF and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.5, wide) whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.0.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Vivo V25 Pro 5G Vs Samsung Galaxy M34
| Specifications | Vivo V25 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M34 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11 |
| Screen Size | 6.56 inches | 6.5 inches |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10nm) |
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Internal Storage | 256GB | 64 GB/128 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 89 | 80 | |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11 | |
| Screen Size | 6.56 inches | 6.5 inches | |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10nm) | |
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 256GB | 64 GB/128 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Pure Black, Sailing Blue | Ocean Blue, Space Black | |
| Device type | Smartphone | ||
| Operating System | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11 | |
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Vivo V25 Pro 5G
- Samsung Galaxy M34
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 ratio | ||
| Pixel Density | 398 ppi density | 411 ppi density | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio | |
| Screen size | 6.56 inches | 6.5 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes, with Multitouch | ||
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10nm) | |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal Storage | 256GB | 64 GB/128 GB | |
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | 32 MP (f/2.5, wide) | 32 MP (f/2.0 | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.9, wide) + 8 MP (F/2.2, ultrawide) + 2 MP (F/2.4, macro) + PDAF | 64 MP | |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Stand By | No | ||
| Talk Time | No | ||
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | ||
| Quick Charging | Fast charging 66W, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min | Fast battery charging 15W | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Color changing back panel color | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
| |
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- Vivo V25 Pro 5G
- Samsung Galaxy M34
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Vivo V25 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34
Display Comparison: Vivo V25 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34
Vivo V25 Pro 5G has screen size of 6.56 inches whereas other comes up with 6.5 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2376 pixels and 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses undefined and latter uses Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors.
Camera Comparison: Vivo V25 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34
Vivo V25 Pro 5G comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.9, wide) + 8 MP (F/2.2, ultrawide) + 2 MP (F/2.4, macro) + PDAF whereas Samsung Galaxy M34 comes up with 64 MP. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include LED flash, HDR, panorama.
Performance Comparison: Vivo V25 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) and Exynos 9611 (10nm) respectively. Vivo V25 Pro 5G comes up No card slot and Samsung Galaxy M34 comes up with microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) card slot. CPU used in Vivo V25 Pro 5G is Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) and used in Samsung Galaxy M34 is Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53).