Popular Products
Compare Motorola Moto G52S Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Should you buy Motorola Moto G52S or Xiaomi Redmi Note 9? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Pakistan, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Motorola Moto G52S starts at PKR 41,163 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 starts at PKR 37,548.
Motorola Moto G52S has screen size of 6.6 inches and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has screen size of 6.53 inches . Motorola Moto G52S comes up with internal storage of 128 GB/256 GB and RAM of 4 GB / 6GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 6 GB . Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 50 MP (f/1.8, wide) + 8 MP (f/2.4, ultrawide) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro) and front camera of 16 MP (f/2.2, wide) whereas latter has primary camera of 48 MP (f/1.8 and front camera of 13 MP (f/2.3) Camera.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Motorola Moto G52S Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
| Specifications | Motorola Moto G52S | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 12 | Android OS, 10 |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.53 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) |
| RAM | 4 GB / 6GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 74 | ||
| OS | Android 12 | Android OS, 10 | |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.53 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) | |
| RAM | 4 GB / 6GB | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue | Green, Grey, White | |
| Device type | Smartphone | Phablet | |
| Operating System | Android 12 | Android OS, 10 | |
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual Sim (nano + nano) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Motorola Moto G52S
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
DESIGN | |||
| Height | 164.9 mm | 162.3 mm | |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.95 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g | |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 77.2 mm | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | 19.5:9 | |
| Bezel Less Display | Water-repellent design | Yes, Punch-hole Display | |
| Form Factor | Touch | Touch | |
| Pixel Density | 402 ppi | 395 ppi | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.53 inches | |
| Technology | OLED | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes with multitouch | Capacitive Touchscreen | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) | |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | ARM Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | |
| RAM | 4 GB / 6GB | ||
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slo | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | ||
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | HDR, Portrait, Panorama | |
| Front Camera | 16 MP (f/2.2, wide) | 13 MP (f/2.3) Camera | |
| Primary camera | 50 MP (f/1.8, wide) + 8 MP (f/2.4, ultrawide) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro) | 48 MP (f/1.8 | |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Audio Jeck | 3.5mm Audio Jack | |
| Audio Player | Yes | MP3, WAV, eAAC+ | |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes | |
| Games | Yes | Yes | |
| Speakers | Yes | Yes | |
| Video Player | Yes | MP4, H.264, H.263 | |
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-Removable Li-Po 5000 mAh battery | Non-removable Li-ion 5020 mAh battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive | v5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Browser | Yes | HTML5 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | No | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | Yes | |
| Quick Charging | No | ||
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint Sensor, IR sensor. Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass, gyro | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Popular Mobile
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Motorola Moto G52S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Design Comparison: Motorola Moto G52S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Motorola Moto G52S comes up with a weight of 192 g whereas Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 weights around 199 g . Thickness of Motorola Moto G52S is 9 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 8.95 mm.
Display Comparison: Motorola Moto G52S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Motorola Moto G52S has screen size of 6.6 inches whereas other comes up with 6.53 inches . Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2400 pixels and 1080 x 2340 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses OLED and latter uses undefined.
Camera Comparison: Motorola Moto G52S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Motorola Moto G52S comes up with primary camera of 50 MP (f/1.8, wide) + 8 MP (f/2.4, ultrawide) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro) whereas Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 comes up with 48 MP (f/1.8. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include LED flash, HDR, panorama.
Performance Comparison: Motorola Moto G52S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) and MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) respectively. Motorola Moto G52S comes up microSDXC (uses shared SIM slo card slot and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 comes up with microSDXC (dedicated slot) card slot. CPU used in Motorola Moto G52S is Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) and used in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55).