Popular Products
Compare Motorola Razr 50 Vs Vivo X90
Should you buy Motorola Razr 50 or Vivo X90? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Pakistan, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Motorola Razr 50 starts at PKR 222,296 and Vivo X90 starts at PKR 212,040.
Motorola Razr 50 has screen size of 6.9 inches and Vivo X90 has screen size of 6.56 inches. Motorola Razr 50 comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Vivo X90 comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus and front camera of Punch Hole 32P 0.7µm f/2.45 (Wide Angle) whereas latter has primary camera of 40 MP (wide) + 12 MP (f/1.8 telephoto) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 12 MP and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.5.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Motorola Razr 50 Vs Vivo X90
| Specifications | Motorola Razr 50 | Vivo X90 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 |
| Screen Size | 6.9 inches | 6.56 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | Exynos 2100 (5 nm) |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 74 | 80 | |
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 | |
| Screen Size | 6.9 inches | 6.56 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | Exynos 2100 (5 nm) | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac | Blue; other colours | |
| Custom UI | My UX | ||
| Device type | Smartphone | Smartphone | |
| Operating System | Android v13 | Android v13 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual SIM | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Motorola Razr 50
- Vivo X90
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Plastic front (opened), plastic front (closed), plastic back, aluminum frame (7000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | ||
| Weight | 188.6 g | 181 g | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 22:09 | ||
| Pixel Density | 413 ppi density | 398 ppi | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels | 1080 x 2376 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.9 inches | 6.56 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes, with Multi touch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | Exynos 2100 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor | Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz & 3x2.8 GHz & 4x2.2 GHz) | |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Mali-G78 | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB | |
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | Punch Hole 32P 0.7µm f/2.45 (Wide Angle) | 32 MP (f/2.5 | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus | 40 MP (wide) + 12 MP (f/1.8 telephoto) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 12 MP | |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | No | 3.5mm Audio Jeck | |
| FM Radio | No | Yes | |
| Speakers | Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes | |
BATTERY | |||
| Type | 4201 mAh | Non-Removable Li-Po 5000 mAh Battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3 | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | HTML5 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes | |
| Quick Charging | Yes, 44W Rapid Charging | Fast charging 44W | |
| Sensors | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
| |
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- Motorola Razr 50
- Vivo X90
Popular Mobile
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X90
Display Comparison: Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X90
Motorola Razr 50 has screen size of 6.9 inches whereas other comes up with 6.56 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2640 pixels and 1080 x 2376 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses undefined and latter uses Super AMOLED.
Camera Comparison: Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X90
Motorola Razr 50 comes up with primary camera of 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus whereas Vivo X90 comes up with 40 MP (wide) + 12 MP (f/1.8 telephoto) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 12 MP. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include panorama, HDR.
Performance Comparison: Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X90
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 and Exynos 2100 (5 nm) respectively. Motorola Razr 50 comes up No card slot and Vivo X90 comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Motorola Razr 50 is 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor and used in Vivo X90 is Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz & 3x2.8 GHz & 4x2.2 GHz).