Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy M42 5G Vs Vivo T1 Pro
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy M42 5G or Vivo T1 Pro? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Pakistan, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at PKR 61,556 and Vivo T1 Pro starts at PKR 82,076.
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches and Vivo T1 Pro has screen size of 6.67 inches. Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Vivo T1 Pro comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8 and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.0 whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP(f/1.8, 26mm wide) + 8 MP(f/2.2 ,16mm ultrawide) + 2 MP(f/2.4, macro) and front camera of 16 MP(f/2.5, wide).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G Vs Vivo T1 Pro
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy M42 5G | Vivo T1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android OS, v11 | Android 12 |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB/12 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 79 | 63 | |
| OS | Android OS, v11 | Android 12 | |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.67 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB/12 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Device type | Smartphone | Smartphone | |
| Operating System | Android OS, v11 | Android 12 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy M42 5G
- Vivo T1 Pro
DESIGN | |||
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.7mm | |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 193 g | |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.7mm | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | 20:09 | |
| Form Factor | Touch | Touch | |
| Pixel Density | 266 ppi | 395 ppi | |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | ||
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.67 inches | |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | Capacitive Touchscreen | Yes with multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) | |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L | |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB/12 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | Yes | ||
| Card Slot | microSD Card | No | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB | |
| Messaging | Yes | Yes | |
| Phonebook | Yes | Yes | |
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | OIS, gyro-EIS, HDR, Panorama, AI Camera | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | 32 MP (f/2.0 | 16 MP(f/2.5, wide) | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.8 | 64 MP(f/1.8, 26mm wide) + 8 MP(f/2.2 ,16mm ultrawide) + 2 MP(f/2.4, macro) | |
| Video Recording | 4k, 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes, USB Type-C Audio | ||
| Audio Player | WAV, AAC+, AC3, OGG, FLAC, WMA, MP3, AMR, AAC, MXMF, eAAC+ | Yes | |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes | |
| Games | Yes | Yes | |
| Speakers | Yes | Yes | |
| Video Player | 3GP, ASF, M4V, H.263, H.264, MKV, 3G2, DivX, AVI, WMV, FLV, MPEG4 | Yes | |
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 6000 mAh battery | Non-Removable Li-Po 5000 mAh battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | |
| Browser | HTML5 | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| USB | 3.1 Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB OTG | USB Type-C, USB On-The-Go | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | ||
| Quick Charging | Yes | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy M42 5G
- Vivo T1 Pro
Popular Mobile
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo T1 Pro
Design Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo T1 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up with a weight of 193 g whereas Vivo T1 Pro weights around 193 g. Thickness of Samsung Galaxy M42 5G is 8.6 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 8.5 mm.
Display Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo T1 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches whereas other comes up with 6.67 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 720 x 1600 pixels and 1080 x 2400 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses AMOLED and latter uses IPS LCD.
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo T1 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8 whereas Vivo T1 Pro comes up with 64 MP(f/1.8, 26mm wide) + 8 MP(f/2.2 ,16mm ultrawide) + 2 MP(f/2.4, macro). Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include OIS, gyro-EIS, HDR, Panorama, AI Camera.
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo T1 Pro
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G respectively. Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up microSD Card card slot and Vivo T1 Pro comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Samsung Galaxy M42 5G is 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor and used in Vivo T1 Pro is Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670).