Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 or LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Pakistan, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 starts at PKR 341,996 and LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW starts at PKR 278,093.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has screen size of 7.6 inches and LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW has screen size of 6.8 inches, (83.6% screen-to-body ratio). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes up with internal storage of 512 GB and RAM of 12 GB. LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 6 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 12 MP and front camera of 10 MP (Wide Angle Primary Camera) + 10 MP (Wide Angle Camera) whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP and front camera of 10 MP (f/1.9.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 | LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android OS, v11 | Android 10.0 |
| Screen Size | 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches, (83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 85 | 81 | |
| OS | Android OS, v11 | Android 10.0 | |
| Screen Size | 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches, (83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | |
| RAM | 6 GB | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Custom UI | One UI 2.0 | ||
| Device type | Foldable Phone | ||
| Operating System | Android OS, v11 | Android 10.0 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
- LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
DISPLAY | |||
| Bezel Less Display | Yes, Punch-hole Display | ||
| Form Factor | Touch | ||
| Pixel Density | 372 ppi | 537 ppi density | |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | ||
| Screen resolution | 1768 x 2208 pixels | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | |
| Screen size | 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches, (83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | |
| Technology | AMOLED | P-OLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors | |
| Touchscreen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch | ||
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | |
| CPU | Octa core (3.09 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 + 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 | |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | Yes | ||
| Card Slot | No | microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) | |
| External Storage | No | ||
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Front Camera | 10 MP (Wide Angle Primary Camera) + 10 MP (Wide Angle Camera) | 10 MP (f/1.9 | |
| Primary camera | 12 MP | 64 MP | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes, USB Type-C | ||
| FM Radio | Yes | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 4275 mAh battery | 5000 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Browser | HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes with A-GPS, Glonass | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, charging connector pins | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | ||
| Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
- LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
Popular Mobile
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
Display Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has screen size of 7.6 inches whereas other comes up with 6.8 inches, (83.6% screen-to-body ratio). Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1768 x 2208 pixels and 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses AMOLED and latter uses P-OLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors.
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes up with primary camera of 12 MP whereas LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW comes up with 64 MP. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include undefined.
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus and Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) respectively. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes up No card slot and LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW comes up with microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) card slot. CPU used in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is Octa core (3.09 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 + 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585) and used in LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW is Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585.