Popular Products
Compare Amazfit GTS Smartwatch Vs Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Should you buy Amazfit GTS Smartwatch or Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch? Well, your search ends here. Find out which Smartwatch is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Amazfit GTS Smartwatch starts at ₹ 9,490 and Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch starts at ₹ 10,496.
Amazfit GTS Smartwatch has screen size of 1.65 in and Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch has screen size of 1.1 inch . Amazfit GTS Smartwatch comes up with a great resolution of 348 x 442 pixels and 341 ppi PPI whereas Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch comes up with a great resolution of 348 x 442 pixels and 308 ppi PPI.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Amazfit GTS Smartwatch Vs Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
| Specifications | Amazfit GTS Smartwatch | Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Backup | 14 days | 21 days |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.0 | Yes, 5.0 |
| Material | Aircraft-grade aluminum alloy, polymer material | Stainless steel |
| Size | 1.65 in | 1.1 in |
| Water Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Compatible OS | Android 5.0 or iOS 10.0 and above | Android & iOS |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 49 | 44 | |
| Battery Backup | 14 days | 21 days | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.0 | Yes, 5.0 | |
| Material | Aircraft-grade aluminum alloy, polymer material | Stainless steel | |
| Size | 1.65 in | 1.1 in | |
| Water Resistant | Yes | Yes | |
| Compatible OS | Android 5.0 or iOS 10.0 and above | Android & iOS | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Amazfit GTS Smartwatch
- Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Battery | |||
| Battery Capacity | 220 mAh | ||
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion Polymer | Lithium Ion | |
| Battery Backup | 14 days | 21 days | |
| StandBy Time | 1.5 months | ||
Camera | |||
| Camera | No | No | |
Connectivity | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.0 | Yes, 5.0 | |
| GPS | Yes | No | |
Design And Body | |||
| Material | Aircraft-grade aluminum alloy, polymer material | Stainless steel | |
| Shape | Rectangle | Circle | |
Display | |||
| Type | Color AMOLED | ||
| Touch | Yes | Yes | |
| Size | 1.65 in | 1.1 in | |
| Resolution | 348 x 442 pixels | 240 x 240 pixels | |
| PPI | 341 ppi | 308 ppi | |
Extra | |||
| Sensors | SensorsBioTrackerTM PPG Bio-Tracking Optical Sensor, 6-axis acceleration sensor, 3-axis geomagnetic sensor, Air pressure sensor, Ambient light sensor | Accelerometer, Heart Rate Sensor | |
| Extra Features | GPS + GLONASS | ||
Features | |||
| Water Resistant | Yes | Yes | |
| Water Resistant Depth | 5 ATM | 50 m | |
| Meters and sensors | Pedometer, Heart Rate Monitor, Calorie Count, Step Count, Sleep Monitor | Heart Rate Monitor, Calorie Count, Step Count, Sleep Monitor | |
Technical | |||
| Compatible OS | Android 5.0 or iOS 10.0 and above | Android & iOS | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Amazfit GTS Smartwatch
- Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Popular Smartwatch
- Under 2K
- 2-5K
- 5-10K
- Above 10K
Detailed Comparison of Amazfit GTS Smartwatch vs Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Design Comparison: Amazfit GTS Smartwatch vs Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Amazfit GTS Smartwatch has comes up with a great resolution of 348 x 442 pixels and 341 ppi whereas latter has has comes up with a great resolution of 240 x 240 pixels and 308 ppi respectively.
Display Comparison: Amazfit GTS Smartwatch vs Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Amazfit GTS Smartwatch has dial size of 1.65 in and Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch has dial size of 1.1 in. In terms of Technology, Amazfit GTS Smartwatch compatible with Android 5.0 or iOS 10.0 and above and Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch compatible with Android & iOS.
Display Comparison: Amazfit GTS Smartwatch vs Fossil FTW7010 Hybrid Smartwatch
Amazfit GTS Smartwatch has screen size of 1.65 in whereas other comes up with 1.1 in. Screen Resolution and PPI of these Smartwatches models is 348 x 442 pixels, 341 ppi and 240 x 240 pixels, 341 ppi respectively.