Popular Products
Compare Apple A12 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820
What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 820 and Apple A12 Bionic? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 820 or should go for Apple A12 Bionic? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 820 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 380901 and Apple A12 Bionic has AnTuTu score of 407476. HiSilicon Kirin 820 comes up with 8 cores, 2360 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Apple A12 Bionic has 6 cores and 2490 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Kirin 820 Vs A12 Bionic
| Specifications | Kirin 820 | A12 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 380901 | 407476 |
| Frequency | 2360 MHz | 2490 MHz |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 2688 x 1242 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 130435 | 129259 |
| GPU | 116461 | 148052 |
| Memory | 70562 | 56934 |
| UX | 62183 | 63018 |
| Total score | 380901 | 407476 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- Kirin 820
- A12 Bionic
Connectivity Features | ||
| Modem | Balong 5000 | |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 22 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1600 Mbps | Up to 1000 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 200 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A763x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2360 MHz | 2490 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Apple A12 Bionic GPU |
| Architecture | Valhall | |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Execution units | 6 | 4 |
| Shading units | 96 | |
| FLOPS | 579 Gigaflops | 560 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 1x 64 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 31.78 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | NVMe |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 2688 x 1242 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 2x 12MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | Protected AAC, AAC?LC, Apple Lossless, HE?AAC, Linear PCM, AAX ? AAX+, HE?AAC v2, MP3 |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 58 FPS [Low] | |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 41 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] | |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 48 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Genshin Impact | 33 FPS [Medium] | |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 57 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Device | Huawei Honor X10 1080 x 2400 | |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- Kirin 820
- A12 Bionic
Popular Mobiles
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Kirin 820 vs A12 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 820 has been announced on March 2020 whereas Apple A12 Bionic has been announced on September 2018. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A12 Bionic
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 820 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 380901 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 130435, 116461, 70562, 62183 respectively.
CPU Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A12 Bionic
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 820 comes up with the architecture of Valhall and A12 Bionic comes up with architecture of undefined. Former one has 8 core and 2360 MHz frequency and latter has 6 cores and 2490 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Memory Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A12 Bionic
First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Apple A12 Bionic has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A12 Bionic
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 820 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1 and A12 Bionic has Yes NPU and NVMe storage type.
