What is the difference between Apple A12 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 7570? Should you buy phone having Apple A12 Bionic or should go for Samsung Exynos 7570? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Apple A12 Bionic has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 407476 and Samsung Exynos 7570 has AnTuTu score of 56511. Apple A12 Bionic comes up with 6 cores, 2490 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 7570 has 4 cores and 1400 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
| Specifications | A12 Bionic | Exynos 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 407476 | 56511 |
| Frequency | 2490 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Max size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Max display resolution | 2688 x 1242 | 1363 x 1280 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 129259 | 26311 |
| GPU | 148052 | |
| Memory | 56934 | 20220 |
| UX | 63018 | 9577 |
| Total score | 407476 | 56511 |
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 5 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1000 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 50 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2490 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 6.9 billion | 2 billion |
| TDP | 6 W | 4 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 131.35 Mpixels/s | 17.25 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 17.45 images/s | 3.49 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 70.4 words/s | 9.24 words/s |
| Machine learning | 58.9 images/s | 4.51 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 17.75 images/s | 1.99 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 3.17 Mnodes/s | 0.4 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 670.45 Krows/s | 107.7 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Apple A12 Bionic GPU | Mali T-720 MP2 |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| FLOPS | 560 Gigaflops | 36 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 11 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Bus | 1x 64 Bit | 1x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 7.46 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | No |
| Storage type | NVMe | eMMC 5.0 |
| Max display resolution | 2688 x 1242 | 1363 x 1280 |
| Max camera resolution | 2x 12MP | 1x 13MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG | H.264, H.265 |
| Audio codecs | Protected AAC, AAC?LC, Apple Lossless, HE?AAC, Linear PCM, AAX ? AAX+, HE?AAC v2, MP3 | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Apple A12 Bionic has been announced on September 2018 whereas Samsung Exynos 7570 has been announced on August 2016. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. A12 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 407476 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 129259, 148052, 56934, 63018 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A12 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and Exynos 7570 comes up with architecture of Midgard. Former one has 6 core and 2490 MHz frequency and latter has 4 cores and 1400 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Samsung Exynos 7570 has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, A12 Bionic has Yes NPU with storage type as NVMe and Exynos 7570 has No NPU and eMMC 5.0 storage type.