Popular Products
Compare MediaTek MT6737 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
What is the difference between Apple A14 Bionic and MediaTek MT6737? Should you buy phone having Apple A14 Bionic or should go for MediaTek MT6737? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Apple A14 Bionic has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 614956 and MediaTek MT6737 has AnTuTu score of 41491. Apple A14 Bionic comes up with 6 cores, 2990 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek MT6737 has 4 cores and 1300 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
A14 Bionic Vs MT6737
| Specifications | A14 Bionic | MT6737 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 614956 | 41491 |
| Frequency | 2990 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Max size | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Max display resolution | 2732 x 2048 | 1280 x 720 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 173864 | |
| GPU | 208037 | |
| Memory | 106696 | |
| UX | 93575 | |
| Total score | 614956 | 41491 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- A14 Bionic
- MT6737
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 5 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.99 GHz – Firestorm4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2990 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 28 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 11.8 billion | 1 billion |
| TDP | 6 W | 7 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 174.85 Mpixels/s | |
| Face detection | 33.7 images/s | |
| Speech recognition | 95.65 words/s | |
| Machine learning | 95.8 images/s | |
| Camera shooting | 38.45 images/s | |
| HTML 5 | 4.59 Mnodes/s | |
| SQLite | 1060 Krows/s | |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Apple GPU | Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
| Max bandwidth | 42.7 Gbit/s | 4.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Neural Engine | No |
| Storage type | NVMe | eMMC 5.0 |
| Max display resolution | 2732 x 2048 | 1280 x 720 |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9, Motion JPEG | H.264, H.265 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- A14 Bionic
- MT6737
Popular Mobiles
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of A14 Bionic vs MT6737
Apple A14 Bionic has been announced on September 2020 whereas MediaTek MT6737 has been announced on January 2016. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: A14 Bionic vs MT6737
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. A14 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 614956 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 173864, 208037, 106696, 93575 respectively.
CPU Comparison: A14 Bionic vs MT6737
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A14 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and MT6737 comes up with architecture of Midgard. Former one has 6 core and 2990 MHz frequency and latter has 4 cores and 1300 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Memory Comparison: A14 Bionic vs MT6737
First chipset has max size of 6 GB and MediaTek MT6737 has max size of 6 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: A14 Bionic vs MT6737
In terms of multimedia, A14 Bionic has Neural Engine NPU with storage type as NVMe and MT6737 has No NPU and eMMC 5.0 storage type.
