Compare Samsung Exynos 9825 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)

Discuss

What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Samsung Exynos 9825? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) or should go for Samsung Exynos 9825? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.

HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 436390 and Samsung Exynos 9825 has AnTuTu score of 459787. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with 8 cores, 2860 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9825 has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 9825 comes up with Mali G76 MP12 GPU and Bifrost architecture.

Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.

Kirin 990 (4G) Vs Exynos 9825

SpecificationsKirin 990 (4G)Exynos 9825
Total score436390459787
Frequency2860 MHz2730 MHz
Max size12 GB12 GB
Max display resolution3360 x 14403840 x 2400
+ Read More

Compare Chipsets

Hide Common features
AnTuTu Score
CPU 138017132299
GPU 145170173903
Memory 9851684417
UX 5532465501
Total score 436390459787
Connectivity Features
4G support LTE Cat. 21LTE Cat. 20
5G support NoYes
Download speed Up to 1400 MbpsUp to 2000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 MbpsUp to 316 Mbps
Wi-Fi 66
Bluetooth 5.05.0
Performance
Processor 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A552x 2.73 GHz – M42x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A754x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 88
Frequency 2860 MHz2730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-AARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 512 KB2 MB
Process 7 nanometers7 nanometers
Transistor count 8 billion8.5 billion
TDP 6 W9 W
Geekbench Score
Image compression 148.7 Mpixels/s
Face detection 23.9 images/s
Speech recognition 54.1 words/s
Machine learning 55.8 images/s
Camera shooting 28.2 images/s
HTML 5 3.13 Mnodes/s
SQLite 797.5 Krows/s
Graphics
GPU name Mali G76 MP16Mali G76 MP12
Architecture BifrostBifrost
GPU frequency 600 MHz600 MHz
Execution units 1612
Shading units 256192
FLOPS 768 Gigaflops943 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.01.1
OpenCL version 2.02.0
DirectX version 1212
Memory Info
Memory type LPDDR4XLPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 31.78 Gbit/s31.1 Gbit/s
Max size 12 GB12 GB
Multimedia
Neural processor (NPU) Da VinciYes
Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3360 x 14403840 x 2400
Video capture 4K at 60FPS8K at 60FPS, 4K at 150FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS8K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VC-1H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Game Performance
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 41 FPS [Ultra]
Fortnite 29 FPS [Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends 55 FPS [Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS [Ultra]
Device Huawei Mate 30 Pro 1146 x 2400

Which Chipset would you prefer?

Infinity%
0%

Total:0

Detailed Comparison of Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825

HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019 whereas Samsung Exynos 9825 has been announced on August 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:

Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825

Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 990 (4G) has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 436390 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 138017, 145170, 98516, 55324 respectively.

CPU Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825

CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and Exynos 9825 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2860 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.

Graphics Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825

HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9825 has Mali G76 MP12 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.

Memory Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825

First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Samsung Exynos 9825 has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.

Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825

In terms of multimedia, Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 and Exynos 9825 has Yes NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.

Comments

FAQs

Q. Which model has better AnTuTu score - Kirin 990 (4G) or Exynos 9825?

Exynos 9825 has higher AnTuTu score at 459787 compare to Kirin 990 (4G) with total AnTuTu score at 436390 only.

Q. Which model has higher base frequency among Kirin 990 (4G) and Exynos 9825?

Kirin 990 (4G) has a higher base frequency of 2860 MHz compared to Exynos 9825 with 2730 MHz base frequency.

Q. Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825, which model has higher bandwidth?

Kirin 990 (4G) with 31.78 Gbit/s bandwidth is better than Exynos 9825 with 31.1 Gbit/s bandwidth.

Q. Which model has higher number of cores - Kirin 990 (4G) or Exynos 9825?

Both Exynos 9825 and Kirin 990 (4G) have same cores value of 8 cores.

Q. What are some of the best phones having - Exynos 9825 in the market?