What is the difference between MediaTek MT6737 and MediaTek Helio G95? Should you buy phone having MediaTek MT6737 or should go for MediaTek Helio G95? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
MediaTek MT6737 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 41491 and MediaTek Helio G95 has AnTuTu score of 302316. MediaTek MT6737 comes up with 4 cores, 1300 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Helio G95 has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, MediaTek MT6737 has Mali-T720 MP2 GPU and Midgard architecture and latter MediaTek Helio G95 comes up with Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | MT6737 | Helio G95 |
---|---|---|
Total score | 41491 | 302316 |
Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Max size | 3 GB | 10 GB |
Max display resolution | 1280 x 720 | 2520 x 1080 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
Total score | 41491 | 302316 |
Connectivity Features | ||
Modem | MT6169 | |
4G support | LTE Cat. 5 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 50 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 4 | 8 |
Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Process | 28 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | 1 billion | |
TDP | 7 W | 5 W |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali-T720 MP2 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 500-650 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shading units | 32 | 64 |
FLOPS | 34 Gigaflops | 195.8 Gigaflops |
OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 640 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 1x 32 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 4.9 Gbit/s | |
Max size | 3 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | No | Da Vinci |
Storage type | eMMC 5.0 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 1280 x 720 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
MediaTek MT6737 has been announced on January 2016 whereas MediaTek Helio G95 has been announced on September 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. MT6737 comes up with the architecture of Midgard and Helio G95 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 4 core and 1300 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
MediaTek MT6737 has Mali-T720 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 500-650 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. MediaTek Helio G95 has Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU with GPU Frequency as 900 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 3 GB and MediaTek Helio G95 has max size of 3 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, MT6737 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.0 and Helio G95 has Da Vinci NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.