Popular Products
Compare Samsung Exynos 9611 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
What is the difference between Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and Samsung Exynos 9611? Should you buy phone having Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G or should go for Samsung Exynos 9611? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 314355 and Samsung Exynos 9611 has AnTuTu score of 183257. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G comes up with 8 cores, 2400 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9611 has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G has Adreno 620 GPU and Adreno 600 architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 9611 comes up with Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Snapdragon 765G Vs Exynos 9611
| Specifications | Snapdragon 765G | Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 314355 | 183257 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Max size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Max display resolution | 3200 x 1800 | 2560 x 1600 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 103523 | 55979 |
| GPU | 93915 | 48708 |
| Memory | 65489 | 43050 |
| UX | 63805 | 38397 |
| Total score | 314355 | 183257 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- Snapdragon 765G
- Exynos 9611
Connectivity Features | ||
| Modem | X52 | |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1200 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 210 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A734x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| TDP | 8 W | 8 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 95.1 Mpixels/s | 74.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 12.3 images/s | 11.7 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 30.3 words/s | 25 words/s |
| Machine learning | 29.6 images/s | 17.7 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 14.2 images/s | 8.82 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.24 Mnodes/s | 1.24 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 515.7 Krows/s | 434 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Adreno 620 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 3 |
| Shading units | 192 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 582 Gigaflops | 259 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | |
| Max size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 696 | No |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3200 x 1800 | 2560 x 1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 57 FPS [High] | 31 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 38 FPS [Ultra] | 40 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 29 FPS [Medium] | |
| Shadowgun Legends | 67 FPS [Low] | |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 43 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 55 FPS [Ultra] | 38 FPS [High] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi K30 1080 x 2400 | Samsung Galaxy A51 1080 x 2400 |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- Snapdragon 765G
- Exynos 9611
Popular Mobiles
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon 765G vs Exynos 9611
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G has been announced on December 2019 whereas Samsung Exynos 9611 has been announced on September 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: Snapdragon 765G vs Exynos 9611
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Snapdragon 765G has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 314355 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 103523, 93915, 65489, 63805 respectively.
CPU Comparison: Snapdragon 765G vs Exynos 9611
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Snapdragon 765G comes up with the architecture of Adreno 600 and Exynos 9611 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2400 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Graphics Comparison: Snapdragon 765G vs Exynos 9611
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G has Adreno 620 GPU with GPU Frequency as 750 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9611 has Mali-G72 MP3 GPU with GPU Frequency as 850 MHz.
Memory Comparison: Snapdragon 765G vs Exynos 9611
First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Samsung Exynos 9611 has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Snapdragon 765G vs Exynos 9611
In terms of multimedia, Snapdragon 765G has Hexagon 696 NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 and Exynos 9611 has No NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.
