What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 7570 and Samsung Exynos 9825? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 7570 or should go for Samsung Exynos 9825? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Samsung Exynos 7570 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 56511 and Samsung Exynos 9825 has AnTuTu score of 459787. Samsung Exynos 7570 comes up with 4 cores, 1400 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9825 has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Samsung Exynos 7570 has Mali T-720 MP2 GPU and Midgard architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 9825 comes up with Mali G76 MP12 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
| Specifications | Exynos 7570 | Exynos 9825 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 56511 | 459787 |
| Frequency | 1400 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| Max size | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Max display resolution | 1363 x 1280 | 3840 x 2400 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 26311 | 132299 |
| Memory | 20220 | 84417 |
| UX | 9577 | 65501 |
| Total score | 56511 | 459787 |
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 5 | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 2000 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 50 Mbps | Up to 316 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.73 GHz – M42x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A754x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1400 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 2 billion | 8.5 billion |
| TDP | 4 W | 9 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 17.25 Mpixels/s | |
| Face detection | 3.49 images/s | |
| Speech recognition | 9.24 words/s | |
| Machine learning | 4.51 images/s | |
| Camera shooting | 1.99 images/s | |
| HTML 5 | 0.4 Mnodes/s | |
| SQLite | 107.7 Krows/s | |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali T-720 MP2 | Mali G76 MP12 |
| Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 12 |
| Shading units | 16 | 192 |
| FLOPS | 36 Gigaflops | 943 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 1x 32 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 7.46 Gbit/s | 31.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Yes |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.0 | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 1363 x 1280 | 3840 x 2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Samsung Exynos 7570 has been announced on August 2016 whereas Samsung Exynos 9825 has been announced on August 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 7570 comes up with the architecture of Midgard and Exynos 9825 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 4 core and 1400 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Samsung Exynos 7570 has Mali T-720 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 650 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9825 has Mali G76 MP12 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 4 GB and Samsung Exynos 9825 has max size of 4 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Exynos 7570 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.0 and Exynos 9825 has Yes NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.