What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 7885 and Apple A11 Bionic? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 7885 or should go for Apple A11 Bionic? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Samsung Exynos 7885 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 139511 and Apple A11 Bionic has AnTuTu score of 317306. Samsung Exynos 7885 comes up with 8 cores, 2200 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Apple A11 Bionic has 6 cores and 2390 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
| Specifications | Exynos 7885 | A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 139511 | 317306 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2390 MHz |
| Max size | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Max display resolution | 2220 x 1080 | 2436 x 1125 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 55018 | 88563 |
| GPU | 25265 | 75396 |
| Memory | 30641 | 44020 |
| UX | 35906 | 40315 |
| Total score | 139511 | 317306 |
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A736x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.39 GHz – Monsoon4x 0 GHz – Mistral |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2390 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 2 billion | 4.3 billion |
| TDP | 8 W | 8 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 60.6 Mpixels/s | 128.4 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 8.46 images/s | 21.9 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 20.8 words/s | 45.2 words/s |
| Machine learning | 14.4 images/s | 39.6 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 7.03 images/s | 24.2 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.18 Mnodes/s | 3.16 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 312.2 Krows/s | 756.85 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali-G71 MP2 | Apple GPU |
| Architecture | Bifrost | |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | |
| Execution units | 2 | 3 |
| Shading units | 32 | |
| FLOPS | 29 Gigaflops | 325 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max size | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Neural Engine |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | NVMe |
| Max display resolution | 2220 x 1080 | 2436 x 1125 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 21MP, 2x 16MP | 2x 12MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Samsung Exynos 7885 has been announced on February 2018 whereas Apple A11 Bionic has been announced on September 2017. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Exynos 7885 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 139511 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 55018, 25265, 30641, 35906 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 7885 comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and A11 Bionic comes up with architecture of undefined. Former one has 8 core and 2200 MHz frequency and latter has 6 cores and 2390 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
First chipset has max size of 4 GB and Apple A11 Bionic has max size of 4 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Exynos 7885 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1 and A11 Bionic has Neural Engine NPU and NVMe storage type.