What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 850 and Apple A11 Bionic? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 850 or should go for Apple A11 Bionic? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Samsung Exynos 850 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 126856 and Apple A11 Bionic has AnTuTu score of 317306. Samsung Exynos 850 comes up with 8 cores, 2000 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Apple A11 Bionic has 6 cores and 2390 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
| Specifications | Exynos 850 | A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 126856 | 317306 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2390 MHz |
| Max size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2436 x 1125 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 47319 | 88563 |
| GPU | 20564 | 75396 |
| Memory | 35627 | 44020 |
| UX | 21661 | 40315 |
| Total score | 126856 | 317306 |
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.39 GHz – Monsoon4x 0 GHz – Mistral |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2390 MHz |
| Process | 8 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| TDP | 7 W | 8 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 71.2 Mpixels/s | 128.4 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 8.11 images/s | 21.9 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 17 words/s | 45.2 words/s |
| Machine learning | 12.9 images/s | 39.6 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 5.06 images/s | 24.2 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.34 Mnodes/s | 3.16 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 356.2 Krows/s | 756.85 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP1 | Apple GPU |
| Architecture | Bifrost | |
| GPU frequency | 820 MHz | |
| Execution units | 6 | 3 |
| Shading units | 96 | |
| FLOPS | 26 Gigaflops | 325 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Neural Engine |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | NVMe |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2436 x 1125 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 22MP, 2x 16MP | 2x 12MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Samsung Exynos 850 has been announced on May 2020 whereas Apple A11 Bionic has been announced on September 2017. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Exynos 850 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 126856 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 47319, 20564, 35627, 21661 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 850 comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and A11 Bionic comes up with architecture of undefined. Former one has 8 core and 2000 MHz frequency and latter has 6 cores and 2390 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
First chipset has max size of 8 GB and Apple A11 Bionic has max size of 8 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Exynos 850 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1 and A11 Bionic has Neural Engine NPU and NVMe storage type.