Popular Products
Compare MediaTek MT6737 Vs Apple A13 Bionic
What is the difference between Apple A13 Bionic and MediaTek MT6737? Should you buy phone having Apple A13 Bionic or should go for MediaTek MT6737? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Apple A13 Bionic has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 526466 and MediaTek MT6737 has AnTuTu score of 41491. Apple A13 Bionic comes up with 6 cores, 2660 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek MT6737 has 4 cores and 1300 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
A13 Bionic Vs MT6737
| Specifications | A13 Bionic | MT6737 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 526466 | 41491 |
| Frequency | 2660 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Max display resolution | 2688 x 1242 | 1280 x 720 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 158367 | |
| GPU | 218423 | |
| Memory | 65604 | |
| UX | 80367 | |
| Total score | 526466 | 41491 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- A13 Bionic
- MT6737
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 5 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1200 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 220 Mbps | Up to 50 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.66 GHz – Lightning4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2660 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 48 KB | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 28 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 8.5 billion | 1 billion |
| TDP | 6 W | 7 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 151.6 Mpixels/s | |
| Face detection | 29.65 images/s | |
| Speech recognition | 87.4 words/s | |
| Machine learning | 72.5 images/s | |
| Camera shooting | 33.75 images/s | |
| HTML 5 | 3.81 Mnodes/s | |
| SQLite | 901.1 Krows/s | |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Apple A13 Bionic GPU | Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| FLOPS | 736 Gigaflops | 34 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | |
| OpenCL version | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 11 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 1x 32 Bit |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes, Neural Engine | No |
| Storage type | NVMe | eMMC 5.0 |
| Max display resolution | 2688 x 1242 | 1280 x 720 |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG | H.264, H.265 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 57 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Fortnite | 60 FPS [High] | |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Genshin Impact | 59 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Device | Apple iPhone 11 Pro 828 x 1792 | |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- A13 Bionic
- MT6737
Popular Mobiles
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of A13 Bionic vs MT6737
Apple A13 Bionic has been announced on September 2019 whereas MediaTek MT6737 has been announced on January 2016. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: A13 Bionic vs MT6737
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. A13 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 526466 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 158367, 218423, 65604, 80367 respectively.
CPU Comparison: A13 Bionic vs MT6737
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A13 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and MT6737 comes up with architecture of Midgard. Former one has 6 core and 2660 MHz frequency and latter has 4 cores and 1300 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: A13 Bionic vs MT6737
In terms of multimedia, A13 Bionic has Yes, Neural Engine NPU with storage type as NVMe and MT6737 has No NPU and eMMC 5.0 storage type.
