Compare Samsung Exynos 9825 Vs Apple A13 Bionic

Discuss

What is the difference between Apple A13 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 9825? Should you buy phone having Apple A13 Bionic or should go for Samsung Exynos 9825? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.

Apple A13 Bionic has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 526466 and Samsung Exynos 9825 has AnTuTu score of 459787. Apple A13 Bionic comes up with 6 cores, 2660 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9825 has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency.

Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.

A13 Bionic Vs Exynos 9825

SpecificationsA13 BionicExynos 9825
Total score526466459787
Frequency2660 MHz2730 MHz
Max display resolution2688 x 12423840 x 2400
+ Read More

Compare Chipsets

Hide Common features
apple_a_series.jpeg
A13 Bionic
samsung_exynos.jpeg
Exynos 9825
AnTuTu Score
CPU 158367132299
GPU 218423173903
Memory 6560484417
UX 8036765501
Total score 526466459787

Chipset Mobile Phones

  • A13 Bionic
  • Exynos 9825

Connectivity Features
4G support LTE Cat. 18LTE Cat. 20
5G support NoYes
Download speed Up to 1200 MbpsUp to 2000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 220 MbpsUp to 316 Mbps
Wi-Fi 66
Bluetooth 5.05.0
Performance
Processor 2x 2.66 GHz – Lightning4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder2x 2.73 GHz – M42x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A754x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 68
Frequency 2660 MHz2730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-AARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 48 KB512 KB
L2 cache 4 MB2 MB
Process 7 nanometers7 nanometers
Transistor count 8.5 billion8.5 billion
TDP 6 W9 W
Geekbench Score
Image compression 151.6 Mpixels/s
Face detection 29.65 images/s
Speech recognition 87.4 words/s
Machine learning 72.5 images/s
Camera shooting 33.75 images/s
HTML 5 3.81 Mnodes/s
SQLite 901.1 Krows/s
Graphics
GPU name Apple A13 Bionic GPUMali G76 MP12
Execution units 412
FLOPS 736 Gigaflops943 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.11.1
OpenCL version 2.12.0
DirectX version 12.112
Memory Info
Memory type LPDDR4XLPDDR4X
Bus 2x 32 Bit4x 16 Bit
Multimedia
Neural processor (NPU) Yes, Neural EngineYes
Storage type NVMeUFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2688 x 12423840 x 2400
Video capture 4K at 60FPS8K at 60FPS, 4K at 150FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS8K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, Motion JPEGH.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Game Performance
PUBG Mobile 57 FPS [Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS [Ultra]
Fortnite 60 FPS [High]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra]
Genshin Impact 59 FPS [Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS [Ultra]
Device Apple iPhone 11 Pro 828 x 1792

Browse Chipset By

  • Popular Chipset
  • Upcoming Chipset

popular Mobile Chipsets

Which Chipset would you prefer?

Infinity%
0%

Total:0

Similar Comparison

  • A13 Bionic
  • Exynos 9825

Popular Mobiles

  • Under 10K
  • 10-20K
  • 20-40K
  • Above 40K

Mobiles under 10K

Detailed Comparison of A13 Bionic vs Exynos 9825

Apple A13 Bionic has been announced on September 2019 whereas Samsung Exynos 9825 has been announced on August 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:

Benchmark Comparison: A13 Bionic vs Exynos 9825

Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. A13 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 526466 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 158367, 218423, 65604, 80367 respectively.

CPU Comparison: A13 Bionic vs Exynos 9825

CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A13 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and Exynos 9825 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 6 core and 2660 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.

Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: A13 Bionic vs Exynos 9825

In terms of multimedia, A13 Bionic has Yes, Neural Engine NPU with storage type as NVMe and Exynos 9825 has Yes NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.

Comments

FAQs

Q. Which model has better AnTuTu score - A13 Bionic or Exynos 9825?

A13 Bionic has higher AnTuTu score at 526466 compare to Exynos 9825 with total AnTuTu score at 459787 only.

Q. Which model has higher base frequency among A13 Bionic and Exynos 9825?

Exynos 9825 has a higher base frequency of 2730 MHz compared to A13 Bionic with 2660 MHz base frequency.

Q. Which model has higher number of cores - A13 Bionic or Exynos 9825?

Exynos 9825 has 8 cores which is higher than A13 Bionic that has 6 cores.

Q. What are some of the best phones having - A13 Bionic in the market?

Best phones having A13 Bionic are Apple iPhone 11, Apple iPhone 11 Pro, Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max.

Q. What are some of the best phones having - Exynos 9825 in the market?

Best phones having Exynos 9825 are Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus, Samsung Galaxy F62, Samsung Galaxy Note 11.

Mobile Price Range

Popular Mobile Chipset Brands

  • mediatek-chipset
  • samsung-chipset
  • apple-chipset
  • qualcomm-chipset
  • hisilicon-chipset

Recent News

See All News