What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 9000E and MediaTek Helio G80? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 9000E or should go for MediaTek Helio G80? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 642091 and MediaTek Helio G80 has AnTuTu score of 203244. HiSilicon Kirin 9000E comes up with 8 cores, 3130 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Helio G80 has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has Mali-G78 MP22 GPU and Valhall 2 architecture and latter MediaTek Helio G80 comes up with Mali-G52 MP2 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Kirin 9000E | Helio G80 |
---|---|---|
Total score | 642091 | 203244 |
Frequency | 3130 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Max size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
Total score | 642091 | 203244 |
Connectivity Features | ||
Modem | Balong 5000 | |
4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A773x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A774x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 3130 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 5 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | 15.3 billion | |
TDP | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
Architecture | Valhall 2 | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 22 | 2 |
Shading units | 352 | 32 |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
Max size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | AI accelerator | Neural Engine |
Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has been announced on October 2020 whereas MediaTek Helio G80 has been announced on February 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 9000E comes up with the architecture of Valhall 2 and Helio G80 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 3130 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has Mali-G78 MP22 GPU with GPU Frequency as 760 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. MediaTek Helio G80 has Mali-G52 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 950 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 16 GB and MediaTek Helio G80 has max size of 16 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 9000E has AI accelerator NPU with storage type as UFS 3.1 and Helio G80 has Neural Engine NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.